Washington Mutual
Washington Mutual (often abbreviated as WaMu) was, until its dramatic collapse, the largest Savings and Loan Association in the United States. Its story is a classic boom-and-bust saga and a stark cautionary tale from the Subprime Mortgage Crisis of 2008. Founded in 1889, WaMu grew from a local Seattle building society into a national banking powerhouse with over 2,200 branches. However, its aggressive pursuit of growth in the early 2000s led it deep into the riskiest corners of the mortgage market. By loading up its Balance Sheet with toxic subprime mortgages and exotic loan products, WaMu built a house of cards. When the U.S. Housing Bubble burst, the company suffered catastrophic losses. On September 25, 2008, federal regulators seized the bank in what remains the largest bank failure in American history. Its banking operations were sold by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to JPMorgan Chase for a pittance, wiping out shareholders completely. For investors, the WaMu saga is a powerful lesson in risk, hubris, and the importance of looking past slick marketing to understand a company's true health.
From Main Street to Wall Street: The Rise of WaMu
For much of its history, Washington Mutual was a relatively conservative institution. It grew steadily for a century, primarily through acquiring other thrifts and banks, earning a reputation for friendly, customer-focused service. It branded itself as the “bank of Main Street,” a stark contrast to the perceived stuffiness of Wall Street giants. By the early 2000s, it had become a colossal retail bank, a household name across America. This friendly facade, however, masked a radical shift in strategy happening behind the scenes—a high-stakes bet that would ultimately lead to its downfall.
The Road to Ruin
The seeds of WaMu's destruction were sown when it abandoned its prudent lending culture in a feverish pursuit of market share and short-term profits.
The Siren Song of Subprime
Under the leadership of CEO Kerry Killinger, WaMu dove headfirst into the subprime mortgage market. The bank became one of the nation's largest originators of a particularly risky product: the Option ARM (Adjustable-Rate Mortgage). These loans were a ticking time bomb, designed with the following features:
- Tempting “Teaser” Rates: They offered incredibly low initial interest rates, sometimes as low as 1%, to entice borrowers.
- Payment Options: Borrowers could choose to make a minimum payment that didn't even cover the interest due. The unpaid interest was then added to the loan balance, a process called negative amortization. This meant borrowers could pay their mortgage every month and see their debt grow larger.
- Payment Shocks: After a few years, the teaser rates would expire, and the loan would reset to a much higher variable rate. This, combined with a larger principal, caused monthly payments to skyrocket, pushing many borrowers into default.
WaMu's lending standards deteriorated rapidly. It became infamous for so-called “liar loans,” where income and assets were stated by the borrower but not verified by the bank. This strategy allowed WaMu to rapidly grow its loan book and report impressive profits, but it was building its foundation on quicksand.
The Great Collapse
When the housing market turned in 2007, WaMu's business model imploded. As property values fell and interest rates reset, defaults on its low-quality mortgages surged. The bank's massive portfolio of toxic loans began generating billions of dollars in losses. Confidence in the bank evaporated. In September 2008, following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, nervous depositors staged a “silent” Bank Run, withdrawing an astonishing $16.7 billion over just 10 days. Facing a liquidity crisis, WaMu was on the brink. The federal Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) stepped in, declaring that the bank was in an “unsafe and unsound condition to transact business.” On the night of September 25, 2008, the OTS seized WaMu and placed it into FDIC receivership. In a swift move, the FDIC sold the bank's operations to JPMorgan Chase for just $1.9 billion. WaMu's holding company later filed for Bankruptcy, and its shareholders, who had held stock worth over $30 per share just a few years earlier, were left with nothing.
Lessons for the Value Investor
The spectacular nosedive of Washington Mutual offers timeless lessons for any prudent investor, perfectly aligning with the core principles of Value Investing.
"Know What You Own" Is Not a Suggestion
The legendary investor Warren Buffett famously advises, “Never invest in a business you cannot understand.” As WaMu gorged on risky mortgages, its balance sheet became a black box of complex and opaque financial instruments. It was nearly impossible for an outsider to gauge the true riskiness of its loan portfolio. Lesson: If you cannot confidently explain how a company makes money and what its primary risks are, stay away. This is doubly true for financial institutions, whose liabilities can be opaque and whose business models rely heavily on confidence.
Growth Is Not Always Good
WaMu's story is a classic example of “diworsification”—pursuing growth at any cost, even if it means entering risky, low-quality business lines. The bank abandoned its century-old conservative culture for a quick profits grab. Lesson: Be deeply skeptical of companies reporting explosive growth. Ask yourself: Is this growth sustainable and profitable? Or is it being “bought” by taking on excessive risk, lowering standards, or sacrificing long-term health for short-term gains?
Financials Are Fragile: Demand a Margin of Safety
Banks operate with immense leverage. A small decline in the value of their assets can wipe out their entire Equity base. WaMu's collapse demonstrated that even the largest financial institutions can fail with breathtaking speed. Shareholders lost 100% of their investment. Lesson: When investing in financial firms, the principle of Margin of Safety is paramount. You must demand a significant discount to your estimate of a company's intrinsic value to protect against the inherent fragility and unpredictability of the sector. WaMu proved that being big does not mean you are immune to failure, a crucial counterpoint to the Too Big to Fail narrative that dominated the 2008 crisis.