Public Support Test

• The Bottom Line: The Public Support Test is a value investor's mental model for gauging a company's resilience by asking: how broad, deep, and loyal is its base of support?
• Key Takeaways:
• What it is: A concept—borrowed from the non-profit world—used to measure a company's dependency on a limited number of customers, revenue streams, or suppliers.
• Why it matters: It is a powerful tool for assessing a business's durability and its economic moat. A company that “passes” the test has a lower risk profile and more predictable long-term earnings.
• How to use it: Analyze a company's annual reports to uncover customer concentration, dissect its revenue segments for diversity, and evaluate the qualitative strength of its brand loyalty.

Imagine two local charities. The first, “The Smith Family Foundation,” receives 95% of its annual funding from a single, wealthy benefactor: old Mr. Smith. The second, “Our Town Food Bank,” receives its funding from thousands of small, individual donations from people all over the city. Which charity is more durable? Which one is more likely to be around in ten years? Clearly, it's the food bank. If Mr. Smith has a bad year in the stock market, changes his philanthropic focus, or simply gets into an argument with the director, his foundation is on the brink of collapse. The food bank, however, can easily survive a few donors dropping off. Its support is broad, diversified, and resilient. In the world of non-profits, this idea is formalized into a legal concept called the “Public Support Test,” which the IRS uses to determine if an organization is a “public charity” (like the food bank) or a “private foundation” (like the Smith family's charity). Now, here’s where it gets interesting for us as investors. Value investors have brilliantly repurposed this concept as a powerful mental model for analyzing publicly traded companies. For an investor, the Public Support Test isn't an IRS form; it's a qualitative framework for stress-testing a business model. It asks a simple, yet profound, question: How vulnerable is this company to a single point of failure? Instead of donors, we look at three key pillars of corporate support: 1. Customers: Does the company serve millions of customers, or does it rely on a handful of massive contracts? 2. Revenue Streams: Does the company make money from a variety of products, services, and geographic regions, or is it a one-trick pony? 3. Brand & Reputation: Does the company command widespread, loyal support from the public, creating a powerful brand that acts as a protective moat? A company that is heavily dependent on one customer, one product, or one supplier is like the charity relying on Mr. Smith. It may look successful on the surface, but it's standing on a rickety, one-legged stool. A company with a broad base of public support is standing on a solid, stable foundation, ready to weather any storm.

“The key to investing is not assessing how much an industry is going to affect society, or how much it will grow, but rather determining the competitive advantage of any given company and, above all, the durability of that advantage.” - Warren Buffett

Buffett's focus on “durability” is the very essence of the Public Support Test. It's not just about today's profits; it's about the resilience of those profits for decades to come.

For a value investor, the Public Support Test isn't just a neat idea; it's a critical component of risk assessment and a direct input into understanding a company's true worth. It aligns perfectly with the core tenets of value investing.

• Strengthening the Margin of Safety: The fundamental principle of value investing is to buy a security for significantly less than its underlying value. This gap, the margin of safety, is your protection against errors in judgment or bad luck. A company that passes the Public Support Test has a built-in business model margin of safety. Its diversified support structure makes it inherently less fragile. The risk of a sudden, catastrophic event—like losing its biggest client—is dramatically lower. This business-level resilience reinforces your financial margin of safety.
• Assessing the Durability of Intrinsic Value: A company's intrinsic value is the discounted value of its future cash flows. The key word there is future. A fragile business has unpredictable, volatile future cash flows. An aerospace supplier that gets 80% of its revenue from Boeing has a future that is tied entirely to Boeing's production schedule and procurement decisions. A company like Procter & Gamble, selling hundreds of products to billions of people, has a future cash flow stream that is far more predictable and, therefore, more reliably valued. The Public Support Test helps you distinguish between companies with fleeting earnings and those with truly durable, long-term value.
• Identifying a True Economic Moat: A moat is a sustainable competitive advantage that protects a company from competitors, just as a moat protects a castle. The ultimate form of public support is a powerful brand that lives in the minds of millions of consumers. Think of Coca-Cola or Apple. Their support isn't just transactional; it's emotional. This brand loyalty creates pricing power and repeat business, forming a wide and deep moat that is incredibly difficult for competitors to cross. The test helps you see if a company's “support” is merely contractual or if it's a deeply ingrained competitive advantage.
• Avoiding Speculation and “Story Stocks”: Many speculative investments are built on a single narrative: a new technology, a pending FDA approval, or a single large contract. These are classic “one-legged stools.” They fail the Public Support Test spectacularly. By applying this framework, you force yourself to look past the exciting story and examine the underlying structure of the business. It grounds you in the reality of risk and helps you avoid businesses built on hope rather than solid foundations.

The Public Support Test is not a simple formula you can plug into a spreadsheet. It's a method of investigative analysis, a way of thinking like a business owner. Here’s how you can apply it.

Your primary tool for this investigation will be the company's annual report, particularly the 10-K filing for U.S. companies.¹⁾

1. Step 1: Scrutinize the Customer Base (The “Who”)
   • Action: Read the “Business” and “Risk Factors” sections of the 10-K.
   • Look For: Companies are required to disclose if any single customer accounts for 10% or more of their total revenue. This is a massive red flag. The “Risk Factors” section will explicitly state things like, “Our business is highly dependent on our relationships with a small number of major customers.”
   • Questions to Ask:
     • Is there a named “major customer”? How much of the revenue do they represent?
     • Even if no single customer is over 10%, is the industry naturally concentrated? (e.g., selling parts to only three major automakers).
     • Conversely, does the company serve millions of individual consumers or a large number of diverse business clients? This is the ideal scenario.
2. Step 2: Dissect the Revenue Streams (The “What” and “Where”)
   • Action: Analyze the “Segment Information” in the financial statements section of the 10-K.
   • Look For: A breakdown of revenue by product line, service type, and geographic region.
   • Questions to Ask:
     • Product Diversity: Is the company a one-trick pony, or does it have a portfolio of successful products? Is all its revenue tied to the fate of a single blockbuster drug or software platform?
     • Geographic Diversity: Does the company earn its revenue globally, or is it entirely dependent on the economic health of a single country? A global footprint provides a buffer against regional downturns.
     • Business Model Diversity: Does it make money in different ways? (e.g., selling hardware, software subscriptions, and services).
3. Step 3: Evaluate the Brand Moat (The “Why”)
   • Action: This is more qualitative and requires you to step outside the 10-K.
   • Look For: Evidence of genuine public loyalty and pricing power.
   • Questions to Ask:
     • Pricing Power: If the company raises its prices by 10%, would customers flee, or would they grumble and pay up? The ability to raise prices without losing business is a hallmark of a strong brand.
     • Brand Loyalty: Do people buy the product out of habit, necessity, or genuine affection? Think of the lines outside an Apple store for a new iPhone. That's a powerful form of public support.
     • Durability: Has this brand been dominant for decades? A long history of leadership suggests a deep and resilient connection with the public.

Let's compare two hypothetical companies to see the Public Support Test in action: “Titan Turbine Parts Inc.” and “Global Beverage Corp.”

• Focus on Quality and Durability: It forces you to look beyond short-term earnings and assess the long-term resilience of the business itself, which is the heart of value investing.
• Uncovers Hidden Risks: Concentration risk is one of the most common and dangerous pitfalls for investors. This framework shines a bright light on it, helping you avoid companies that look good on paper but are secretly fragile.
• Blends Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis: It requires you to both read the financial statements (the “what”) and think critically about the company's relationship with its customers and its place in the world (the “why”).
• Simple and Intuitive: The core concept is easy to grasp. You don't need a PhD in finance to understand that relying on one customer is riskier than relying on millions.

• Not a Timing Tool: The Public Support Test tells you about the quality of a business, not the price of its stock. A wonderfully durable company can still be a terrible investment if you overpay for it. Always apply it in conjunction with a valuation analysis to ensure a margin_of_safety.
• Industry Context is Crucial: What constitutes “concentration” is relative. A company that builds nuclear submarines will naturally have only one major customer (the government). A company that makes potato chips should have millions. You must apply the test within the company's specific circle of competence and industry structure.
• Data Can Be Obscured: While companies must report >10% customers, they often don't provide a full, granular breakdown. Assessing brand strength is also subjective. It requires judgment and detective work, not just calculation.
• Risk of “Diworsification”: A company can have many revenue streams that are all equally bad or unrelated to its core strengths. The goal is not just diversity, but strong, synergistic diversity.

• economic_moat
• margin_of_safety
• concentration_risk
• intrinsic_value
• qualitative_analysis
• risk_management
• circle_of_competence