Loan Companies

• The Bottom Line: Loan companies are in the simple business of “renting money,” but their success hinges entirely on the treacherous art of risk management; for a value investor, they represent a field of both great opportunity and catastrophic danger.
• Key Takeaways:
• What it is: A business that borrows money at one rate (its cost of funds) and lends it out at a higher rate, profiting from the difference, known as the “spread.”
• Why it matters: The health of loan companies is a powerful indicator of the broader economy's health, and their inherent use of leverage means that small misjudgments about credit risk can lead to massive losses. economic_moat.
• How to use it: Value investors analyze loan companies not by their growth, but by the quality of their loans, the cost and stability of their funding, and the discipline of their management.

Imagine you own a specialty equipment rental shop. You buy a professional-grade lawnmower for $1,000. This is your “funding cost.” You then rent it out to your neighbors for $50 a weekend. That's your “interest income.” The difference is your profit. Simple enough. But what if a neighbor returns the lawnmower broken, or worse, never returns it at all? Suddenly, your profitable little business has a major loss. At its core, a loan company is a “money-renting” business. It's one of the oldest business models in the world. They acquire money cheaply (from depositors, bondholders, or other banks) and “rent” it out to individuals and businesses at a higher price. The “rent” they charge is called interest. The difference between the interest they earn and the interest they pay is their core profit, often measured by a metric called the Net Interest Margin (NIM). These companies come in many shapes and sizes:

• Commercial Banks: The classic example, like Wells Fargo or JPMorgan Chase. They take deposits from customers (a very cheap and stable source of funding) and make a wide variety of loans, from mortgages to business loans.
• Non-Bank Lenders: These institutions don't take customer deposits. They raise money by issuing bonds or borrowing from bigger banks. This category includes:
• Mortgage Lenders: Like Rocket Mortgage, focused on home loans.
• Auto Lenders: Like the financing arms of Ford and GM, or specialized companies like Ally Financial.
• Credit Card Companies: Like American Express and Capital One, which are technically banks but whose primary business is unsecured consumer lending.
• Specialty Finance Companies & BDCs: These lend to specific niches, like small businesses, that larger banks might ignore.

The entire business looks deceptively simple on paper. As Warren Buffett famously said:

“Banking is a very good business unless you do dumb things.”

The “dumb things” almost always involve misjudging risk—renting your best lawnmower to the one person in town known for destroying things. For a loan company, this means making bad loans that are never paid back.

To a value investor, a loan company isn't a tech company with a revolutionary new product. It's a balance sheet. It's a portfolio of promises. Understanding this business model is critical because it's a world of extremes, governed by principles that are central to value investing.

• The Ultimate Test of Management Quality: In most businesses, a mediocre management team can coast on a great brand or product. In lending, a reckless or overly optimistic management team can destroy decades of value in a single economic downturn. Value investors look for lenders run by paranoid bankers—people who obsess over what could go wrong. The culture of underwriting (the process of vetting borrowers) is everything. Is management focused on making good loans, or just making more loans?
• The “Black Box” Problem and Margin of Safety: When you buy stock in Coca-Cola, you can see people drinking its products. When you buy stock in a loan company, you are buying a share of a loan portfolio—a “black box” filled with thousands of individual loans you will never see. You don't know if they lent money to “Steady Eddie's Hardware Store” or “Get-Rich-Quick Crypto Ventures.” This opacity makes a large margin_of_safety absolutely essential. You must buy at a price that gives you a buffer for the inevitable bad loans hiding in the portfolio.
• Cyclicality and Human Psychology: Lending is intensely cyclical. When the economy is booming, everyone looks like a great credit risk. Unemployment is low, businesses are growing, and asset prices are rising. Lenders relax their standards to chase growth. This is when the “dumb things” happen. When the inevitable recession hits, those relaxed standards come home to roost as defaults skyrocket. A true value investor is most interested in lenders after a crisis, when fear is rampant and only the most disciplined institutions are left standing strong.
• Leverage: The Amplifier: Loan companies are built on leverage. They might have $10 of loans for every $1 of their own equity. This leverage magnifies returns in good times, but it also magnifies losses in bad times. A mere 5% loss on their loan portfolio could wipe out 50% of their equity. This financial fragility is why a value investor prioritizes a strong, well-capitalized balance sheet above all else.

Analyzing a loan company is less about predicting future growth and more about playing detective. You are trying to uncover the true quality of the assets inside that “black box.” This requires a different toolkit than analyzing a manufacturing or software company.

A prudent investor should investigate four key areas. Think of it as checking the foundation, the plumbing, the wiring, and the roof of a house. 1. Loan Quality (The Foundation): Is the portfolio solid or cracking? This is the single most important area. You're looking for signs of rot in the loan book.

• Net Charge-Offs (NCOs): This is the percentage of total loans that the company has given up on collecting. It's the lender's version of “cost of goods sold.” A consistently low and stable NCO ratio is a sign of disciplined underwriting. A rapidly rising NCO ratio is a five-alarm fire.
• Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) or Assets (NPAs): These are loans where the borrower has fallen significantly behind on payments (typically 90 days or more). They haven't been written off yet, but they are “sick.” Think of them as the “watch list.” A high NPL ratio suggests future charge-offs are coming.
• Loan Loss Provisions (LLPs): This is the amount of money management sets aside from its current profits to cover expected future loan losses. It's an expense on the income statement. A conservative management team will “provision” aggressively even in good times, building a buffer for the bad times. An aggressive one will under-provision to make current profits look better, a massive red flag.

2. Profitability and Efficiency (The Plumbing): Is the business operating well?

• Net Interest Margin (NIM): As mentioned, this is the difference between the yield on loans and the cost of funds. A higher NIM is generally better, but not if it's achieved by taking on excessive risk (e.g., lending to subprime borrowers at 25%). A stable, healthy NIM is the goal.
• Efficiency Ratio: This measures non-interest expenses (like salaries and rent) as a percentage of revenue. In simple terms, how many cents does it cost the bank to generate a dollar of revenue? Lower is better. A ratio below 60% is typically considered good for a traditional bank.

3. Capital Strength (The Roof): Can it withstand a storm?

• Book Value and Tangible Book Value (TBV) per Share: For a lender, book value has real meaning. It's a rough estimate of what would be left over for shareholders if the company were liquidated. Tangible book value is even more conservative, as it strips out intangible assets like “goodwill.” Value investors often use Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) as a primary valuation metric, looking to buy at or below TBV.
• Capital Ratios (e.g., CET1): For regulated banks, this is a critical measure of their financial buffer. The Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio measures a bank's highest quality capital against its risk-weighted assets. A higher number indicates a stronger balance sheet that is better able to absorb unexpected losses.

4. Funding Mix (The Wiring): Is the power source stable?

• How do they get their money? Is it from sticky, low-cost customer deposits (like a checking account)? This is the gold standard—stable and cheap. Or do they rely on “hot money” like brokered deposits or wholesale borrowing from other financial institutions? This funding can be expensive and can disappear overnight in a crisis. A strong deposit base is a significant economic_moat.

No single number tells the whole story. You must look at the trends over a full economic cycle (5-10 years). Is the NCO ratio low now but was it disastrous in the last recession? Did management learn its lesson? Reading the CEO's letter to shareholders in the annual reports from those tough years is incredibly revealing. An honest, self-critical management team is a rare and valuable asset.

Let's compare two hypothetical lenders at the peak of an economic boom: “Fortress Bank” and “Go-Go Lending Inc.”

On the surface, Go-Go Lending might look more attractive. Its NIM is double that of Fortress, it appears more efficient, and it's trading at a discount to its tangible book value! Many momentum investors would pile in, chasing that high growth. A value investor, however, sees a parade of red flags:

• Go-Go's high NIM comes from its risky lending niche (subprime auto). This is a classic sign of reaching for yield.
• Its NCOs are already high and rising, even in a good economy. Imagine what will happen in a recession.
• Its reliance on wholesale funding is a ticking time bomb. If a crisis hits, its funding could dry up instantly.
• The “cheap” 0.8x P/TBV multiple isn't a bargain; it's a warning. The market is pricing in the high probability that its tangible book value will be vaporized by future loan losses.

Fortress Bank, on the other hand, is a value investor's dream. It's a “boring” business focused on disciplined underwriting, funded by stable deposits. Its profitability is steady, not spectacular. When the inevitable recession arrives, Go-Go Lending will likely face massive losses, while Fortress Bank will not only survive but will be strong enough to acquire distressed assets on the cheap. The patient investor prefers the fortress over the house of cards, every time.

• Understandable Business Model: The core concept of borrowing low and lending high is simple, fitting Buffett's advice to stay within one's circle_of_competence.
• Potential for Compounding: Well-run lenders can consistently earn returns above their cost of capital, allowing them to grow their book value steadily over time.
• Durable Moats: Some lenders, particularly those with massive, low-cost deposit bases, have powerful and durable economic moats that are difficult for competitors to replicate.

• The Black Box: The inherent opacity of the loan book means investors are always at a disadvantage and must trust management's representations. This is a business where you can't “kick the tires.”
• Extreme Cyclicality: The temptation to grow the loan book during economic booms by lowering standards is immense. This “pro-cyclicality” is the most common cause of failure.
• Destructive Leverage: The high leverage inherent in the model means there is virtually no room for error. A single bad year of underwriting can erase five good years of profits.
• Asset-Liability Mismatch: Many lenders borrow short-term (e.g., deposits that can be withdrawn anytime) and lend long-term (e.g., a 30-year mortgage). A sudden spike in interest_rates can crush their profitability if they are not properly hedged. ¹⁾.

• margin_of_safety
• tangible_book_value
• economic_moat
• leverage
• circle_of_competence
• interest_rates
• business_development_companies_bdcs