Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Table
The 30-Second Summary
- The Bottom Line: This is a statistical roadmap that predicts how long your retirement portfolio needs to last for both you and your partner, helping you manage the single greatest financial risk in retirement: outliving your money.
- Key Takeaways:
- What it is: A data table that estimates the expected lifespan of a couple, specifically forecasting the age at which the last surviving partner will likely pass away.
- Why it matters: It forces a realistic, data-driven perspective on your true investment_horizon, which is essential for successful long-term investing and preventing financial hardship for the surviving spouse.
- How to use it: To stress-test your retirement plan, determine sustainable withdrawal rates, and make smarter decisions about Social Security and annuities.
What is a Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Table? A Plain English Definition
Imagine you and your spouse are about to embark on a long road trip. You wouldn’t just pack a lunch and a single tank of gas if your destination is across the country. You'd check a map, calculate the total distance, and plan for fuel, food, and lodging for the entire journey. A Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Table is the financial equivalent of that map. It's a simple chart, but it answers one of the most critical questions for any couple planning their future: “How long does our journey together likely last, and therefore, how long does our money need to last?” Most people are familiar with a standard life expectancy table, which gives an average lifespan for a single individual of a certain age. But for a couple, that's like planning a trip for only one driver. The journey doesn't end until the car is parked for good. A joint life table calculates how long, on average, until the second partner passes away. Here's the crucial insight that surprises most people: a couple's joint life expectancy is significantly longer than their individual expectancies. Think of it this way:
- A 65-year-old man might have an individual life expectancy of 84.
- A 65-year-old woman might have an individual life expectancy of 87.
It's tempting to just average those numbers, or maybe plan until age 87. But that's a dangerous mistake. The probability of both partners passing away before, say, age 88 is much lower than just one of them. The odds are high that at least one of you will live much longer. The joint and last survivor table accounts for this, and might tell our 65-year-old couple that their joint life expectancy is actually closer to age 95. That’s an enormous difference. Planning for a 22-year retirement (from 65 to 87) versus a 30-year retirement (from 65 to 95) requires a completely different strategy, mindset, and portfolio. This table provides the data-driven foundation for that strategy.
“Someone's sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago.” - Warren Buffett
This table is the tool that helps you understand just how long that shade will be needed, ensuring the tree you plant today is large enough to provide comfort for your entire financial lives.
Why It Matters to a Value Investor
While a joint life table might seem like a tool for an estate planner or an actuary, it is profoundly important for a value investor. Its principles are deeply aligned with the core tenets of intelligent investing taught by Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett. Here's why. 1. It Defines Your True Investment Horizon A value investor's single greatest advantage over Wall Street is a long time horizon. We don't try to predict next quarter's earnings; we invest in wonderful businesses we want to own for decades. The market is a moody, irrational voting machine in the short term, but a reliable weighing machine in the long term. This table reveals that your “long term” is almost certainly longer than you feel it is. When you are 65, it's easy to feel like your investing journey is nearing its end. The joint life table provides a rational counterpoint to that emotion, showing that your portfolio may need to support you and your spouse for another 30 years or more. This knowledge provides the fortitude to:
- Buy during downturns: Knowing you have a 30-year runway makes buying a great company at a discount during a market panic a rational opportunity, not a terrifying risk.
- Let winners run: It gives you the patience to allow the magic of compounding to work, turning good investments into life-changing wealth, without getting scared out of the market by temporary volatility.
2. It Builds a Margin of Safety into Your Life The cornerstone of value investing is the margin_of_safety. When buying a stock, it means paying a price significantly below your estimate of its intrinsic_value. This buffer protects you from errors in judgment, bad luck, or unforeseen problems. In retirement planning, the joint life table is a primary tool for building a margin of safety for your life. The ultimate investment failure is not underperforming the S&P 500; it's running out of money when you need it most. By planning for a lifespan based on the last survivor's expectancy (and then perhaps adding a few years for good measure), you are creating a crucial buffer. You are building a financial plan that protects the surviving spouse—who is often more financially vulnerable—from poverty in their final years. This is the most humane and critical margin of safety you can create. 3. It Fosters Rational, Business-Like Planning Value investors are business analysts. We don't “play the market”; we analyze the financial health and long-term prospects of a business. This same rational, unemotional approach should be applied to your own finances. Think of your household as “You, Inc.”
- Assets: Your investment portfolio, home, etc.
- Liabilities: Your annual living expenses, for the rest of your lives.
The joint life table is the best tool you have for estimating the duration of those liabilities. It replaces emotional guesswork (“I feel like we'll live to 90”) with cold, hard data. This allows you to make unemotional, business-like decisions about how to manage your assets (your portfolio) to meet those future liabilities, protecting “You, Inc.” from insolvency.
How to Apply It in Practice
You don't need complex software or an advanced degree to use this concept. The goal is to find a reliable table and use its data to inform your financial decisions.
The Method
- Step 1: Find a Credible Table. You don't need to buy anything. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) provides these tables for public use, primarily for calculating Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from retirement accounts. The most relevant one is the “Uniform Lifetime Table” from IRS Publication 590-B. While it's designed for RMDs, it's based on joint life expectancy calculations and serves as an excellent, conservative starting point for planning.
- Step 2: Locate Your Ages and the Corresponding Factor. The IRS Uniform Lifetime Table is simplified. You just need the age of the account owner. For example, if you are 75, you'd look down the “Age” column to 75.
- Step 3: Find the “Distribution Period”. Next to age 75, you'll see a number, which is the distribution period or life expectancy factor. For age 75, this factor is 24.6. This suggests a planning horizon of roughly 24.6 years, taking you to the cusp of age 100. 1)
Interpreting the Result
The number you find isn't a magic ball. It's a data point to anchor your strategy. Here’s how to use it to make better decisions:
- Stress-Test Your Withdrawal Rate: The famous 4_percent_rule was based on a 30-year retirement. If the table suggests your joint horizon is 30 years or more, the 4% rule might be reasonable. But if you retire early at 55, your joint horizon could be 40+ years, suggesting a more conservative withdrawal rate (like 3% or 3.5%) is necessary to create a margin of safety.
- Inform Your Social Security Strategy: This is a huge one. The data overwhelmingly shows that for couples with a long joint life expectancy, it is highly advantageous for the higher-earning spouse to delay claiming Social Security until age 70. This maximizes their monthly benefit, and more importantly, it locks in a much larger survivor's benefit for their partner, who will receive that higher amount for the rest of their life.
- Re-evaluate Your Asset Allocation: The knowledge that your portfolio needs to last for 30 or more years is a powerful argument against becoming too conservative too early. A portfolio heavily weighted in cash and bonds might feel “safe,” but it's highly vulnerable to inflation risk over multiple decades. A long joint time horizon necessitates maintaining a meaningful allocation to high-quality stocks to provide the growth needed to preserve your purchasing power.
A Practical Example
Let's consider two identical couples to see how this concept changes everything. The Williams Couple & The Johnson Couple
- Both couples are 65 years old.
- Both have saved a $1 million retirement portfolio.
- Both are in good health.
^ Planning Approach ^ The Williams (Guesswork Method) ^ The Johnsons (Data-Driven Method) ^
Horizon Assumption | They use Mr. William's single life expectancy of 85. They plan for a 20-year retirement. | They consult the IRS Uniform Lifetime Table, find a factor around 26, and plan for a ~30-year retirement to age 95, adding a buffer. |
Withdrawal Strategy | “We only need the money for 20 years, so we can take out 5% ($50,000) a year. That feels safe.” | “With a 30-year horizon, we need to be more careful. Let's stick to a 3.5% withdrawal rate ($35,000) to ensure the money lasts.” |
Asset Allocation | “We're retired, time to be safe.” They move to 80% bonds and 20% stocks. | “We need this money to grow for 30 years to beat inflation.” They maintain a 60% stock, 40% bond allocation. |
The Outcome | By age 88, their portfolio is heavily depleted by withdrawals and has not grown enough to keep up with inflation. If Mrs. William lives to 94, she faces years of severe financial stress. | By age 88, their portfolio has continued to grow, even with withdrawals. When Mr. Johnson passes away, Mrs. Johnson is financially secure and her portfolio is likely larger than when they started. |
The Johnsons didn't have more money or better stocks. They simply had a better map. They used a rational tool to define their true time horizon, and it led them to make a series of smarter, more sustainable decisions that secured their future and protected the surviving spouse.
Advantages and Limitations
Strengths
- Promotes Rationality: It replaces fear, emotion, and guesswork with objective data. This is the bedrock of intelligent investing and financial planning.
- Protects the Surviving Spouse: Its primary function is to plan for the full, combined lifespan of a couple, which is crucial for ensuring the financial well-being of the person who lives longer.
- Encourages a True Long-Term View: It provides a tangible number that forces an investor to think in terms of decades, not quarters, aligning their strategy perfectly with the value investing philosophy.
- Simplicity: Basic versions of these tables (like the IRS Uniform Table) are easy to find and use, making them accessible to any investor.
Weaknesses & Common Pitfalls
- It's an Average, Not a Prophecy: These tables work with probabilities. You and your spouse are individuals, not statistics. You could live much longer or shorter than the average. The key is to use the table as a minimum baseline and add your own margin_of_safety by planning for a few extra years.
- Health is Not Factored In: A standard table doesn't know your lifestyle, family history, or current health status. A very healthy couple should probably plan for an even longer lifespan than the table suggests. Conversely, a couple with serious health issues may need to adjust their assumptions.
- Tables Can Become Outdated: As medicine advances, life expectancies increase. Always try to use the most recent version of a table from a reputable source like the IRS or the Social Security Administration. Using a table from 20 years ago could lead you to dangerously underestimate your lifespan.