Net-Net Working Capital (NNWC) [CapiPedia]

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
======Net-Net Working Capital (NNWC)======
Net-Net Working Capital (NNWC), often called the "net-net" or the "bargain issue" formula, is a rock-bottom valuation metric pioneered by the father of [[value investing]], [[Benjamin Graham]]. Imagine buying a company's entire stock for a price that is less than the cash you could immediately pull out of its metaphorical wallet if you were to shut it down. That's the essence of a net-net. The NNWC calculation determines a company's value using only its most liquid assets, effectively its [[working capital]], after subtracting //all// liabilities. This figure represents an extremely conservative estimate of a company's [[liquidation value]]. For Graham, if you could buy a company’s stock for less than two-thirds of its NNWC, you were getting an extraordinary deal with a massive [[margin of safety]]. It’s the ultimate "heads I win, tails I don't lose much" scenario, as you are theoretically paying less for a piece of the business than its fire-sale worth, with the rest of the business (like buildings, machinery, and brand value) thrown in for free.
===== The Father of Value Investing and His Golden Formula =====
Benjamin Graham developed the NNWC concept in the aftermath of the Great Depression. He needed a foolproof way to find companies so cheap that their survival was almost secondary to their price. He reasoned that if a company's [[market capitalization]] was below its NNWC, an investor was getting a piece of the business for less than the value of its easily sellable assets minus all its debts. This became the foundation of his famous [[cigar butt investing]] approach, which was famously practiced by a young [[Warren Buffett]].
==== The NNWC Formula in Plain English ====
The formula is a powerful tool for sifting through a company's [[balance sheet]] to find hidden value. The standard calculation is beautifully simple:
**NNWC = [[Current Assets]] - [[Total Liabilities]]**
However, Graham, ever the pessimist, often used an even stricter, more conservative version to account for the fact that not all assets are created equal. In a real-world liquidation, you might not get full price for everything.
A more conservative calculation looks like this:
**NNWC = (Cash and Short-Term Investments) + (0.75 x [[Accounts Receivable]]) + (0.50 x [[Inventory]]) - [[Total Liabilities]]**
Let’s break down the logic:
  * **Cash:** Is worth 100% of its value. No discount needed.
  * **Accounts Receivable:** These are bills owed to the company. Graham assumed you could collect about 75 cents on the dollar.
  * **Inventory:** This is the hardest to sell. Graham conservatively valued it at 50 cents on the dollar, as it might need to be sold at a steep discount.
  * **Total Liabilities:** You have to pay back //every single penny// you owe. No discounts here! This includes both short-term debts and long-term debts.
===== The 'Cigar Butt' Investment Strategy =====
Finding a company trading below its NNWC is like finding a discarded cigar butt on the street with one free puff left in it. It’s not pretty, it might not be a high-quality experience, but it’s a free puff. The strategy involves buying these statistically cheap, often unloved and ugly companies, holding them until the market recognizes their ridiculously low price, and then selling for a profit.
==== Finding a Bargain: The Investment Test ====
The core of the strategy is a simple comparison. After calculating the NNWC, you divide it by the number of shares outstanding to get the **NNWC per share**.
**Investment Rule:** If a stock’s price is at or below two-thirds (approx. 67%) of its NNWC per share, it qualifies as a classic Graham "net-net."
For example, if a company has an NNWC per share of $15, a Graham-style investor would only be interested if the stock was trading at or below $10 per share ($15 x 2/3).
===== The Pros and Cons of Hunting for Net-Nets =====
This deep value strategy is powerful, but it's not without its pitfalls. It requires a specific temperament and a healthy dose of skepticism.
==== The Upside: Why It's Tempting ====
  * **Objective and Simple:** The calculation is straightforward, based entirely on numbers from the balance sheet. It removes emotion from the decision.
  * **Huge Margin of Safety:** By buying a company for less than its net cash and easily sellable assets, you create a powerful buffer against mistakes or further business decline.
  * **Proven Historical Returns:** Academic studies and the track records of investors like Graham and Buffett have shown that a diversified basket of net-nets can produce market-beating returns over the long run.
==== The Downside: Why It's Not a Free Lunch ====
  * **They Are Ugly for a Reason:** Companies trading this cheap are almost always facing serious problems—declining sales, poor management, or a broken business model. You must ask, "Why is this company so cheap?"
  * **Value Traps:** A cheap company can always get cheaper. If the business is burning through cash quickly, its NNWC will shrink each quarter, and your margin of safety can evaporate.
  * **Scarcity:** In roaring bull markets, finding true net-nets is like hunting for a needle in a haystack. They are most common during recessions or market crashes.
  * **Diversification is Non-Negotiable:** You should //never// put all your money into a single net-net. Because some will inevitably fail, the strategy only works by holding a diversified portfolio of 15-20 of them, allowing the winners to more than cover the losers.