Imagine you live in a bustling 18th-century town. There's no national currency, no central bank. Instead, the most trusted and financially sound institution in town is “The Merchant's & Farmer's Bank.” To make trade easier, instead of lugging around heavy gold and silver coins, people deposit their precious metals at this bank. In return, the bank gives them beautifully printed “banknotes”—essentially IOUs—promising to pay the bearer the equivalent in gold on demand. Because everyone trusts The Merchant's & Farmer's Bank, these notes start to circulate as money. People use them to buy bread, sell horses, and pay wages. The bank has become a note-issuing bank. It is literally creating a form of currency based on its own credibility and assets. Fast forward to today. This critical function has been almost entirely consolidated. In virtually every country, the sole authority to issue banknotes belongs to a single entity: the central bank.
These institutions are the ultimate note-issuers for their respective economies. As an investor, you can't buy shares in the Federal Reserve. So, is this just a history lesson? Not quite. In a few fascinating corners of the world, due to historical arrangements, a small number of commercial banks—the kind you can invest in—retain the legal right to print their own currency alongside the central authority. The most prominent examples are:
For a value investor, these rare commercial note-issuing banks are like finding a business that owns the only bridge into a thriving city. They possess a unique, state-sanctioned competitive advantage that is nearly impossible for a competitor to replicate.
“The key to investing is not assessing how much an industry is going to affect society, or how much it will grow, but rather determining the competitive advantage of any given company and, above all, the durability of that advantage.” - Warren Buffett
The right to issue currency is one of the most durable advantages imaginable.
The concept of a note-issuing bank is not just a quirky financial fact; it strikes at the very heart of value investing principles: stable businesses, durable moats, and risk assessment. 1. The Ultimate Economic Moat: Warren Buffett searches for businesses with “economic moats”—sustainable competitive advantages that protect them from rivals, much like a moat protects a castle. The legal authority to print a nation's currency is arguably one of the deepest and widest moats in the entire business world. It grants a bank an unparalleled level of prestige, public trust, and brand recognition. When a bank's name is literally on the money in your pocket, it creates a psychological bond and a perception of stability that no advertising campaign can buy. 2. A Source of Zero-Cost “Float”: Value investors, particularly followers of Buffett's methods at Berkshire Hathaway, understand the power of “float.” In the insurance business, float is the cash collected from premiums that has yet to be paid out in claims. This money can be invested for profit in the meantime. Note-issuing commercial banks enjoy a similar, albeit different, benefit. The physical banknotes they issue are, from an accounting perspective, a liability on their balance sheet. It's money they “owe” to the holders of the notes. However, it is an interest-free liability. The bank doesn't have to pay interest on the cash circulating in the economy. This provides a permanent and stable source of zero-cost funding that can be used to make profitable loans and investments, boosting the bank's return_on_equity. 3. Understanding Systemic Importance and Risk: Banks with note-issuing rights are inherently systemically important. A crisis at one of these institutions wouldn't just be a banking failure; it would be a crisis of confidence in the currency itself. Consequently, they are often subject to stricter regulatory oversight but may also benefit from an implicit government backstop, falling into the too_big_to_fail category. For a value investor, this is a double-edged sword. It can mean lower risk of total failure, but it also means heavy regulation that can cap upside potential. It forces a deeper analysis of the bank's relationship with its regulators. 4. A Macroeconomic Barometer: Even when you're not investing directly in a note-issuing bank, the actions of the main note-issuer (the central bank) are the single most important macroeconomic factor for your entire portfolio. The central bank's decisions on how much money to print and what interest rates to set (its monetary_policy) directly influence:
A prudent value investor must, therefore, pay close attention to the credibility and discipline of the central note-issuing authority. A reckless one can destroy the value of the soundest investments through currency debasement.
A value investor can leverage the concept of note-issuing banks in two ways: through microeconomic analysis of specific companies and macroeconomic assessment of the investment environment.
Finding that a bank is a note-issuer is the beginning, not the end, of the analysis.
Let's compare two fictional, but representative, large banks: 1. “Global Commerce Bank” (GCB): A massive, well-run international bank headquartered in New York. It has no note-issuing rights. 2. “Hong Kong Imperial Bank” (HKIB): A similarly sized global bank headquartered in Hong Kong, which holds the right to issue Hong Kong Dollar banknotes. A value investor analyzing their balance sheets might see the following simplified liabilities section:
Bank | Customer Deposits | Bonds and Debt | Notes in Circulation | Total Liabilities |
---|---|---|---|---|
Global Commerce Bank | $1,500 billion | $500 billion | $0 | $2,000 billion |
Hong Kong Imperial Bank | $1,480 billion | $500 billion | $20 billion | $2,000 billion |
At first glance, the difference seems minor. But let's dig deeper. GCB has to pay interest on virtually all of its $1.5 trillion in customer deposits. Let's assume an average interest rate of 2%. That's an annual interest expense of $30 billion. HKIB has a similar deposit base, but it also has $20 billion in notes circulating in the Hong Kong economy. This is $20 billion of funding for which it pays zero interest. If HKIB had to replace that funding with customer deposits at a 2% interest rate, its annual interest expense would be $400 million higher ($20 billion * 2%). This $400 million is a direct, recurring, and predictable boost to HKIB's pre-tax profit that GCB simply cannot replicate. Furthermore, every time a tourist visits Hong Kong and keeps an HKIB banknote as a souvenir, that note may never be redeemed. It's a tiny but permanent, interest-free loan to the bank. Beyond the numbers, the value investor would note that HKIB's brand is synonymous with the economic identity of Hong Kong. Its ATMs dispense its own branded currency. This creates a level of customer loyalty and trust—a key component of the economic_moat—that GCB must spend billions in marketing to try and achieve. The investor's conclusion might be that while both banks are strong, HKIB has a small but unassailable competitive advantage that, compounded over decades, makes it a more resilient and potentially more valuable long-term investment.
When using the note-issuing status as a factor in your investment thesis, it's vital to maintain a balanced perspective.