Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency

• The Bottom Line: The Model Law is a crucial international rulebook that prevents a chaotic, value-destroying free-for-all when a multinational company you've invested in goes bankrupt.
• Key Takeaways:
• What it is: A standardized legal template, created by the United Nations, that helps countries cooperate in handling bankruptcies that span multiple jurisdictions.
• Why it matters: It dramatically reduces risk for investors in global companies by ensuring a more orderly, predictable, and fair process, which helps preserve the company's assets and increases the chances of recovering value. It's a key part of international risk_management.
• How to use it: As an investor, you don't use it directly, but you check if a company's key operating countries have adopted it. Its presence signals a safer and more predictable legal environment, strengthening your margin_of_safety.

Imagine a large cargo ship, the S.S. GlobalCorp, which operates routes all over the world. Its headquarters is in the United States, its crew is from the Philippines, its cargo belongs to customers in Germany and Japan, and it took out loans from banks in the United Kingdom and Singapore. One day, mid-voyage, the S.S. GlobalCorp springs a leak and starts to sink. It's insolvent. Without a universal maritime treaty, what would happen? Chaos. The US authorities might try to claim the ship. The UK and Singaporean banks would send their own tugboats to seize whatever assets they could. The German and Japanese cargo owners would launch legal battles in their own local courts to get their goods back. Each country's salvage crew would be fighting the others, tearing the ship apart in a desperate grab for assets. In the end, the ship is ripped to shreds, its total value is destroyed, and almost no one gets back what they are owed. This chaotic scenario is precisely what used to happen when multinational corporations went bankrupt. A company might have its “main” bankruptcy proceeding in its home country, but its assets in other countries were vulnerable to being seized by local creditors, who would start their own separate legal proceedings. It was a messy, inefficient, and value-destroying nightmare for everyone involved, especially for investors. The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency is the solution to this problem. Developed by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, it's not a binding treaty, but rather a carefully crafted legal template—a “best practices” rulebook—that countries can adopt into their own national laws. Its core principles are simple but powerful:

• Access: It allows a foreign bankruptcy administrator (the “captain” of the insolvency proceeding) to access a local country's courts.
• Recognition: It requires local courts to formally recognize the “main” foreign bankruptcy proceeding.
• Cooperation: It mandates that courts and insolvency administrators in different countries must cooperate with each other.
• Coordination: It helps coordinate multiple proceedings happening in different countries to ensure a unified approach.

In our ship analogy, the Model Law is the universal maritime treaty. When the S.S. GlobalCorp starts to sink, the treaty ensures that the US-appointed administrator is recognized everywhere. All countries agree to work together. Instead of a chaotic asset grab, there is one coordinated salvage operation. The ship's value is preserved as much as possible, and a fair, orderly process is established to distribute the remaining assets to everyone who is owed money or property.

“Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.” - Warren Buffett
¹⁾

At first glance, a complex piece of international law might seem disconnected from the core principles of value investing. But for a disciplined, long-term investor, understanding its implications is crucial for managing risk and assessing value in our globalized economy. Here’s why the Model Law is an essential concept in a value investor's toolkit: 1. It Strengthens Your Margin of Safety: Benjamin Graham's margin of safety is about having a buffer between the price you pay and the company's intrinsic_value. Part of that intrinsic value, especially in deep value cases, is the company's liquidation_value—what you could get back if the business were shut down and its assets sold. The Model Law directly protects this liquidation value. In countries that have adopted it, a multinational's assets are less likely to be “ring-fenced” and picked apart by local creditors. The process is designed to maximize the value of the entire enterprise, not just the local parts. This increases the potential recovery for all stakeholders, including shareholders and bondholders, thus providing a stronger, more reliable floor for your valuation. 2. It's a Proxy for Good Governance (at the Country Level): Value investors prefer to invest in businesses operating in stable, predictable environments with strong rule of law. A country's decision to adopt the Model Law is a powerful signal. It tells the world that it is a serious, reliable place to do business, committed to protecting foreign investors' rights and upholding international commercial standards. When you analyze a company's global footprint, the presence of the Model Law in its key jurisdictions is a positive checkmark in your assessment of corporate_governance and jurisdictional risk. 3. It Reduces “Catastrophic” Risk: Value investors aren't just looking for upside; they are obsessed with avoiding permanent capital loss. A cross-border insolvency is a prime source of such loss. The Model Law transforms the process from an unpredictable, chaotic knife-fight into a more structured, rules-based negotiation. This predictability drastically reduces the risk of a “zero-recovery” outcome that can happen when legal systems don't cooperate. It helps ensure that even in failure, value can be preserved and returned to investors. 4. It Makes Global Diversification Safer: Diversifying your portfolio globally is a wise strategy. However, it introduces new risks, including legal and political risks in foreign countries. The Model Law mitigates one of the most significant of these. By checking for Model Law adoption, you can be more intelligent about your global diversification, favouring investments in jurisdictions that offer investors this critical layer of legal protection. In short, while you may never have to read the legal text, knowing that the Model Law exists and where it applies helps you better price risk, understand a company's downside protection, and make more informed decisions about where to invest your capital globally.

1. —

As an investor, you aren't an international lawyer. You don't need to “apply” the law yourself. Instead, you use its existence as a critical data point in your investment research and risk assessment process.

Here is a simple, four-step method to incorporate the Model Law into your analysis of any company with international operations:

1. Step 1: Map the Company's Global Footprint.

Before you invest, you must understand where the company actually does business. Look in the company's annual report (Form 10-K for U.S. companies) in sections like “Business,” “Properties,” or “Risk Factors.” Identify the key countries where it has significant physical assets, major subsidiaries, a large number of employees, or generates substantial revenue. Don't just focus on the headquarters; focus on where the tangible value resides.

1. Step 2: Check for Model Law Adoption in Those Key Countries.

This is easier than it sounds. UNCITRAL maintains an official, up-to-date status page. Bookmark this link: UNCITRAL Model Law Status. Check the list to see if the key countries you identified in Step 1 have enacted legislation based on the Model Law. Major economies like the United States (as Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code), the United Kingdom, Japan, Canada, and Australia have adopted it.

1. Step 3: Factor the Results into Your Risk Assessment.

Your findings should directly influence how you view the investment's risk profile.

• High Adoption Scenario: If a company's assets are concentrated in countries that have adopted the Model Law, its “jurisdictional insolvency risk” is relatively low. The process in a distress scenario would likely be orderly and coordinated.
• Low Adoption Scenario: If a company has significant assets in countries that have not adopted the Model Law and are known for protectionist legal systems, the risk is much higher. In a bankruptcy, those assets could be lost in a chaotic local legal battle.

1. Step 4: Adjust Your Margin of Safety.

For a company with high jurisdictional insolvency risk (i.e., operating in non-Model Law countries), a prudent value investor should demand a wider margin_of_safety. You need a bigger discount between the price and your estimate of intrinsic_value to compensate you for the elevated risk that, in a worst-case scenario, the company's assets will be destroyed or seized, and your recovery will be zero.

Think of Model Law adoption as a form of country-level “credit rating” for insolvency.

• Positive Signal (Adopted): The country has a modern, investor-friendly legal framework. It values legal predictability and is integrated into the global financial system. This is a green flag.
• Negative Signal (Not Adopted): The country may have an outdated, unpredictable, or protectionist legal system. This is a red flag that requires further investigation. Why haven't they adopted it? Is their own system robust, or is it designed to favour local interests? This uncertainty increases risk.

The key takeaway is that the Model Law is a simple yet powerful litmus test for the quality and safety of a country's legal environment for foreign creditors and investors.

Let's compare two hypothetical global manufacturing companies to see how the Model Law impacts an investment decision. Both are trading at the same, seemingly cheap, valuation multiple.

Now, imagine both companies face a severe industry downturn and are forced into bankruptcy.

The company files for bankruptcy in its main jurisdiction, the United States. Thanks to the Model Law (Chapter 15 in the US), the process is efficient and coordinated:

1. Recognition: The US-appointed administrator immediately files for recognition in Canada, Germany, the UK, and Australia. The courts in those countries quickly grant it.
2. Asset Freeze: A worldwide “stay” is put in place, preventing any single creditor from seizing assets. The factories and distribution centers are protected.
3. Cooperation: The administrator works with all courts to manage the company as a single global entity. They can either devise a global restructuring plan to save the business or conduct an orderly sale of the assets to the highest bidder, maximizing value for everyone.
4. The Investor Outcome: As an investor (either a shareholder or bondholder), you are part of a clear, predictable legal process. While you may still suffer a loss, the process is designed to maximize the total value recovered. The floor under your investment, the liquidation_value, is solid.

Frontier Metals also files for bankruptcy in the United States. However, the situation abroad quickly spirals into chaos:

1. No Recognition: The courts in Country X and Country Y refuse to recognize the US proceeding. They view it as a foreign matter and prioritize their “national interests.”
2. Asset Seizure: A powerful local creditor in Country X gets a local court to order the seizure of the mine. In Country Y, the government steps in and effectively nationalizes the factory to protect local jobs.
3. Value Destruction: The company is instantly dismembered. Its most valuable assets are stripped away, leaving the US parent company as an empty shell. The chance to restructure the entire business as a going concern is gone.
4. The Investor Outcome: As an investor, you are wiped out. The value was in the foreign assets, and because there was no cooperative framework like the Model Law, that value was captured by local players. Your investment goes to zero.

This example clearly demonstrates that even if two companies look similar on a spreadsheet, the legal jurisdictions in which they operate are a fundamental and often overlooked risk factor. The Model Law provides a crucial shield against this risk.

• Increases Predictability and Certainty: The Model Law replaces legal chaos with a clear set of rules. This allows investors and creditors to better predict the outcome of an insolvency, which in turn reduces the risk premium associated with cross-border investments.
• Preserves Enterprise Value: By preventing a premature and disorderly liquidation of assets, it maximizes the chances of either successfully restructuring the business or selling it as a going concern, which is almost always more valuable than selling it off piece by piece.
• Promotes Fairness and Equity: It is designed to ensure that similarly situated creditors are treated similarly, regardless of their nationality or location. It discourages the “hometown advantage” where local creditors get paid first.
• Facilitates Global Trade and Investment: By creating a safer legal environment, the Model Law encourages the flow of capital across borders, as investors have more confidence that their rights will be protected in a downside scenario.

• It's a “Model,” Not a Mandate: Its biggest weakness is that adoption is voluntary. Many important economies have still not adopted it, creating gaps in the global safety net. An investor must always check the status for the specific countries in question.
• Local Variations Can Cause Friction: When countries enact the Model Law, they can make modifications. These differences, while often minor, can sometimes create legal friction between jurisdictions, undermining perfect cooperation.
• The “Public Policy” Exception: A court can refuse to cooperate if doing so would be “manifestly contrary to the public policy” of that country. This is a high bar, but it can be used as a loophole by courts in countries that wish to protect local interests above all else.
• It's a Process, Not a Panacea: The Model Law provides a better process for handling insolvency. It does not create value where there is none. If you invest in a terrible business with no valuable assets, the most efficient bankruptcy process in the world won't save you from losing your money. It does not suspend the fundamental rules of business success and failure.

• risk_management
• margin_of_safety
• liquidation_value
• intrinsic_value
• bankruptcy_and_restructuring
• diversification
• corporate_governance